Breaching the Snake River dams won’t necessarily improve the survival rate of chinook salmon, because returns of the fish appear to be similar everywhere, including areas with pristine freshwater habitats, a new study finds.
“Current efforts to conserve salmon populations assume that restoring habitats modified by anthropogenic factors — e.g. dams, dikes, forestry, road culverts, salmon farms in the coastal ocean — will improve salmon returns and at least partially compensate for worsening ocean conditions,” the study says.
“However, if survival also falls by roughly the same amount in regions with nearly pristine freshwater habitats, it is difficult to argue for a major role of regional factors in causing the decline,” it says.
The study was published Oct. 30 in the scientific journal Fish and Fisheries.
All chinook populations are likely being similarly affected during their time in the ocean, because it is a shared environment, author David Welch told the Capital Press.
“There are still some big puzzles here, because so little research has gone on in the ocean,” Welch said. “For example, we still don’t know how salmon migrate through the ocean or whether different populations of the same species migrate to the same area of the ocean.”
Welch is president of Kintama Research Services, a marine environmental consultancy in Nanaimo, British Columbia.
Commercial catch data show various salmon populations are caught in different regions of the ocean, but researchers have no idea how they migrated there or how long or where they take up residence during their two to three years in the ocean, Welch said.
Possible reasons for poor marine survival are likely multiple, the study finds, with theories including growth, hatchery practices, predation, competition, by-catch mortality in fisheries and ocean conditions.
The theory that the dams result in poorer survival of Snake River spring chinook relative to mid-Columbia chinook populations after smolts migrate past the dams is specific to the Columbia River Basin, the article states.
The theory still plays an important role in Columbia River salmon management, but direct tests of the theory have not found evidence to support it.
The decline of West Coast chinooks is still cause for concern, Welch said.
“With the path many salmon populations are on, in terms of falling marine survival, they may well be headed for extinction,” he said. “This will cause all sorts of chaos because, especially in the U.S., it is against the law — the Endangered Species Act — to allow them to go extinct.”
Bureaucratic and legal systems may not be set up to deal with a situation where key unknown problems are out at sea, while institutional structures are set up to largely respond by calling for more and more extreme responses in freshwater, he said.
Welch compared the situation to a doctor arguing for expanding a patient’s lung capacity, when the patient has liver cancer. The expanded lung capacity doesn’t address the cancer, he said.
“The situation with salmon is that we have a lot of people trying to ‘fix’ possible problems in freshwater that they have identified as being poor,” Welch said. “However, it is not at all clear that freshwater conditions can be improved anywhere near enough to compensate for the poor and still-worsening survival at sea.”
Welch recommends chinook salmon advocates support efforts to get to the root cause of the problems. They should insist on “rigorous evaluation” of proposed fixes to make sure they are actually going to be effective, he said.
The paper collated almost 2,300 years of survival estimates for chinook salmon, Welch said.
The data represents the total number of years of sampling done by government agencies on different Chinook salmon populations that was available for analysis. As salmon survival worsened, government agencies coastwide responded by adding more and more populations to their monitoring efforts, Welch said. Essentially all of them tell the same story of progressively worsening-and similar- levels of survival, regardless of where the populations originated, he said.
Similarly extensive monitoring programs are going on for coho and steelhead, with other, less extensive monitoring programs for sockeye, pink and chum salmon, Welch said.
“The big question is why, with all this monitoring effort, has no one yet pointed out that survival was similar everywhere to what was reported for the Snake River?” he asked. “The data is all publicly available; it just took a lot of work to pull it all together and show the obvious.”
Estimates of the survival of tagged adults returning to the Columbia River failed to recognize that harvest in fisheries was large and variable, which Welch considers “catastrophic” to those estimates.
“It raises the broader question of whether the advocates for extreme measures like dam breaching just have blinders on and can’t really see what is going on,” he said.