Advertisement

Breaking news: Appeals court upholds USDA decision to commercialize biotech alfalfa

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to overturn the USDA's decision to comme ...

Posted: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:21 AM



Content ImageContent Image

Phil Ward, director of Oregon Water Resources Department



Advertisement




Ag interests split over water fee increases

By MITCH LIES

Capital Press

SALEM -- Oregon farm interests are split on a bill to increase fees charged by the Oregon Water Resources Department.

In a committee hearing March 14, Oregon nurseries and irrigation districts voiced support for House Bill 2259, which increases several fees charged by the department, while Oregon dairy farmers and cattlemen opposed it.

The bill increases fees for everything from changing points of diversions to filing protests with the department. Some would jump dramatically: A base fee for appropriating water through a single point of diversion increases from $500 to $800 under the bill, as does a fee for a permit to store water.

The bill also provides for an annual increase of up to 3 percent.

Phil Ward, director of the department, said that without the fee increases, up to one-fourth of the department's 32-member transaction staff will be lost.

The staff processes water right applications and water right transfers, among other functions.

"This piece of legislation is critical to maintaining adequate service levels and avoiding new levels of backlog in the department," Ward said.

April Snell, executive director of the Oregon Water Resouces Congress, which represents irrigation districts, also characterized the bill as a critical piece of legislation.

"While fees are never a fun topic, in this case, this is a very necessary bill," Snell said.

Speaking for the Oregon Dairy Farmers Association, Roger Beyer opposed the bill.

"The dairy economics have not been good," Beyer said. "Any fee increases above where they are today is just unacceptable."

Jim Welsh of the Oregon Cattlemen's Asociation also spoke against the bill.

"We would like to see the general fund maintained closer to 70 percent supporting the mission of the Water Resources Department, and we would like to see the fee base be around 30 percent, not (as is current) over 40 percent," Welsh said.

Rep. Brad Witt, D-Clatskanie, chair of the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, formed a work group to study whether a compromise can be reached.

Comments made about this article

Comment on this article

You must LOGIN to post comments

Advertisement

Copyright © 2009-2013 Capital Press, MediaSpan and The Associated Press where indicated. All rights reserved.

Contact Capital Press at 1-800-882-6789 or click here to find our staff listing.

Site optimized for use with Firefox browser, Ver. 16.0.1

Privacy Policies: Capital Press | MediaSpan Online Services

Other Capital Press websites:

Capital Press | OnlyAg.com | Ag Ads Now | Farm Seller | Ag Directory West | Blogriculture agriculture blog and podcasts

Our sister EO Media Group websites:

The Daily Astorian | Coast Weekend | AstoriaRocks.com | Chinook Observer
Oregon Coast Today | Seaside-Sun.com| Seaside Signal| Cannon Beach Gazette
Coast River Business Journal
Hermiston Herald | East Oregonian | Eastern Oregon Real Estate | EO Marketplace
Blue Mountain Eagle | Wallowa County Chieftain