Advertisement

Posted: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:00 PM




Advertisement




EPA to discuss fuel rule

Farm Bureau:'The only difference is a little more red tape'

By MATTHEW WEAVER

Capital Press

An Environmental Protection Agency representative will meet with farmers about an approaching deadline to have a plan to prevent and contain fuel spills.

Greg Weigel, regional spill prevention control and countermeasures coordinator for EPA, will address growers during a free meeting 9 a.m. May 15 in Ritzville, Wash., hosted by the Washington Association of Wheat Growers.

Weigel has heard from many farmers who have the misconception that the rule, in place with the Clean Water Act in 1974, is new.

"Farm facilities have never been exempt from the rule," he said.

The rule was first amended in 2002 and several times since, requiring facilities to update their plans. The date for compliance has been extended to May 2013.

John Stuhlmiller, director of government relations with the Washington Farm Bureau, believes the amendment reinforces existing regulations.

"Obviously, nobody is ever excited about increasing regulation," he said. "But if you already have a tank that size, the only difference is a little more red tape related to that."

Farmers with above-ground storage capacity of less than 1,320 gallons and underground storage of less than 42,000 gallons are not affected by the rule.

Farmers with less than 5,000 gallons of above-ground storage can use a template provided by EPA without an engineer's certification.

Weigel isn't certain how many farmers would be affected, since there is no requirement for them to register their facility.

"The only facilities we know of come to our attention because we see them or they've had a spill or someone lodged a complaint," he said. "(Farmers) have to determine whether this rule applies to them or not."

Weigel said there have been two enforcement cases in the Pacific Northwest -- one in which the farmer had tanks on a creek bank with no containment or plan and another who had fuel spill into a river and had no plan.

Weigel said the fine could be "substantial" for a spill and lack of a plan. If farmers have a plan and containment but are missing an aspect of requirement or the plan is out of date, the EPA may ask for a fix without a penalty.

"Having a spill prevention plan makes sense," Weigel said. "(Farmers) don't want the stuff to get into the water, either."

If you go

The Washington Association of Wheat Growers meeting will be 9 a.m. May 15 at the Washington Wheat Foundation building, 109 E. First St. in Ritzville, Wash. The meeting is free. Contact WAWG at 509-659-0610.

Online

www.epa.gov/osweroe1/content/spcc/index.htm

Comments made about this article

Comment on this article

You must LOGIN to post comments

Advertisement

Copyright © 2009-2013 Capital Press, MediaSpan and The Associated Press where indicated. All rights reserved.

Contact Capital Press at 1-800-882-6789 or click here to find our staff listing.

Site optimized for use with Firefox browser, Ver. 16.0.1

Privacy Policies: Capital Press | MediaSpan Online Services

Other Capital Press websites:

Capital Press | OnlyAg.com | Ag Ads Now | Farm Seller | Ag Directory West | Blogriculture agriculture blog and podcasts

Our sister EO Media Group websites:

The Daily Astorian | Coast Weekend | AstoriaRocks.com | Chinook Observer
Oregon Coast Today | Seaside-Sun.com| Seaside Signal| Cannon Beach Gazette
Coast River Business Journal
Hermiston Herald | East Oregonian | Eastern Oregon Real Estate | EO Marketplace
Blue Mountain Eagle | Wallowa County Chieftain