Advertisement

Updated: Saturday, October 03, 2009 9:04 AM

  • Print Page
  • Email to a Friend
  • Comments (2)
  • Recommended ( 0 )
Content ImageContent Image

Mitch Lies/Capital Press

Organic vegetable seed grower Frank Morton looks over red chard in a field on his Philomath-area farm. Morton was an instigator behind the lawsuit that put in question the future of Roundup Ready sugar beets.

Advertisement

Organic grower inspires beet lawsuit

'Everything I said to my fellow seedsmen, the judge has now agreed with'

By MITCH LIES

Capital Press

PHILOMATH, Ore. -- Frank Morton said he was told he should sue the USDA if he didn't like Roundup Ready sugar beet seed being produced in Oregon's Willamette Valley.

"I was literally told three times that if you don't like that, you'll have to sue USDA," Morton said.

In January 2008, the Philomath-area organic vegetable seed grower contacted the Center for Food Safety and helped instigate the suit that has put in question the future of transgenic sugar beet production.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White, a Bush-administration appointee, last week ruled the USDA violated the National Environmental Policy Act when it failed to prepare an environmental impact statement before deregulating the genetically engineered beets in 2005.

White has scheduled an Oct. 30 meeting to discuss remedies. The Center for Food Safety and Earthjustice are expected to ask for an injunction banning new plantings until USDA can complete the environmental assessment.

Morton said his primary objective was protecting his business.

"This is not a political concern," he said. "I was concerned that contamination events would begin to occur that would make my seed worthless."

And, he said, the suit was not his first choice.

Morton, a member of the Willamette Valley Specialty Seed Association, said he approached the association several times with his concerns.

"I thought we should be talking about this as an association, and I wanted to talk about this and talk about the impact of having genetically modified crops be a part of the specialty seed mix here in the valley.

"But no one wanted to talk about it," he said. "It was almost like it was an off-limits subject."

Morton said he was worried the genetically engineered seed crop would cross-pollinate with his organic red chard and table beets.

But he was unable to learn where transgenic beets were being planted.

"They did not want to put on the pin that it was genetically engineered," he said, referring to a pinning system growers use to distinguish where vegetable seed crops are produced.

"This is something we don't share with our seed-growing neighbors that I think we should -- whether a crop is genetically engineered or not," he said. "My market doesn't have any tolerance for this.

"I have to test my seed before I sell it and if I ever get a positive for genetic engineering traits, then my seed crops are worthless," he said.

White's order Sept. 21 has extensive implications for an industry already transitioned to beets genetically bred with resistance to Roundup herbicide. About 95 percent of the 1.16 million acres of sugar beets planted this year in the United States were Roundup Ready, industry officials said.

In the Willamette Valley, upwards of 3,000 acres of Roundup Ready sugar beet seed is already in the ground.

Morton has little sympathy for companies and growers who planted Roundup Ready beet seed this year. It was obvious, he said, the judge was going to rule against the USDA, and sugar beet companies and growers should have anticipated the ruling.

"They painted themselves into a corner with a spray paint can," he said. "If there is no beet sugar (next year), it's not my fault and it's not the judge's fault."

Morton produces organic seed under the brand name Wild Garden Seed. In addition to organic chard and table beets, he grows squash and several brassica crop seeds.

"I do feel vindicated," he said, "because everything I said to my fellow seedsmen, the judge has now agreed with."

Staff writer Mitch Lies is based in Salem. E-mail: mlies@capitalpress.com.

Comments made about this article

Posted By: Jon Stevens On: 10/6/2009

Title: Hang in there, Frank!

Great article which summarizes well the sudden shift in our legal system, thanks to the bio-engineering seed companies, from someone who takes from someone else being the aggressor to becoming the victim. If my Angus bull jumps the fence and gets your purebred Holstein cow pregnant, I have a problem. They calf should be yours, not mine. How Monsanto and others got the reverse of that logic and legal tradition in place is a puzzle. Thank you to Frank Morton for stepping up to the plate, and thank you to Capital Press for daring to be fair and balanced in the presentation of the issue. Based on what I have read here, I would have to conclude Frank is on the higher moral ground. But is the judge? We sure hope so!

Report Inappropriate Content

Posted By: Frank Morton, Philomath, OR On: 10/2/2009

Title: Clarifications About Farmer Morton's Sympathy and Feelings

Nice article, and thank you--but a couple corrections for the record: I contacted Center For Food Safety in Dec. 2007. The suit was filed in Jan 2008. "Morton has little sympathy for companies and growers who planted Roundup Ready beet seed this year." I actually said, very specifically, that the growers have no choice about what they plant--they plant what the companies tell them to plant. I do sympathize with the growers who were forced to sow transgenic crops whether they wanted to or not. I do not sympathize with the corporations who went full speed ahead in planning for ongoing GE-sugar beet production despite looming legal precedents against their tenuous legal position in the case. In April of this year, Judge White gave ample warning of his legal impression of the USDA's case, when he delayed the Hearing for six weeks to allow the USDA (and biotech allies) to reconsider its legal position. USDA did not reconsider its position, the sugar beet seed industry did not reconsider its options, and apparently now a high stakes case of brinksmanship has been offered up for consideration in the remedy phase of the proceedings. So be it. "I do feel vindicated," he said, "because everything I said to my fellow seedsmen, the judge has now agreed with." The Editors should have clarified that this was a flat out question from the reporter-- "Do you feel vindicated?"--that I was responding to. My sensation was not one of vindication, but shear relief, that my argument had not fallen on deaf ears once it reached an impartial party--that is, a Judge without financial or political interests at heart. This is a complicated issue involving seed production, genetic engineering, and issues of trespass and responsibility for damages done. Not many of us have considered these things in fine detail, but we need to. That is why a Federal Judge has ordered an Environmental Impact Statement in this Round Up Ready Beet case, as another Judge did in the Round Up Ready Alfalfa case before it. Same issues in each case--impacts on neighbors, markets, consumer choice, and farmers' choice to produce an uncontaminated crop. Sounds like some clear choices to me.

Report Inappropriate Content

Comment on this article

You must LOGIN to post comments

Advertisement

Copyright © 2009 Capital Press, MediaSpan and The Associated Press where indicated. All rights reserved.

Contact Capital Press at 1-800-882-6789 or via e-mail.

Site optimized for use with Mozilla/Firefox browsers, Ver. 3.5

Privacy Policies: Capital Press | MediaSpan Online Services

Other Capital Press websites:

Capital Press | Ag Ads Now | Farm Seller | Recreation Properties | Ag Directory West | Back Forty small farms blog | Blogriculture agriculture blog

Our sister East Oregonian Publishing Co. websites:

The Daily Astorian | Coast Weekend | AstoriaRocks.com | Chinook Observer | Seaside-Sun.com| North Coast Citizen | Cannon Beach Citizen | Hermiston Herald | East Oregonian |
Eastern Oregon Real Estate | EO Marketplace | Blue Mountain Eagle | Wallowa County Chieftain | Ag Directory West