Advertisement

Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 10:00 AM



Content ImageContent Image

Steve Brown/Capital Press

A shovel logger brings a freshly cut Douglas fir tree to a self-loading truck during a logging demonstration Jan. 9 near Carnation, Wash. The tree, 55 to 60 years old, held 1,470 board-feet of lumber.



Advertisement




Carbon study cracks timber myths

Study says carbon absorption slows as trees age

By STEVE BROWN

Capital Press

A report that found logging mature trees and replacing them with young, fast-growing trees as a way to increase carbon sequestration may ultimately be a boon to the region's timber industry, officials said.

The Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials found that carbon absorption by trees slows when they reach 30 to 70 years of age. Elaine Oneil, executive director of the group, also said younger trees absorb more carbon as they grow.

Carbon dioxide is a "greenhouse" gas, which many scientists believe contributes to global warming. By absorbing more carbon dioxide, the younger trees would help reduce global warming.

Rather than leaving all of a forest's tall trees in place, Oneil said, the older ones could be cut and used for building material. The carbon in that wood would be stored permanently.

Also, the leftovers from milling the logs could be used for mulch and biofuel, she said.

"It validates what we believe, that sustainably managed forests play an important part in the climate-change discussion," Anthony Chavez, public affairs manager for timber company Weyerhaeuser, said.

"This could create more demand," Chavez said. "With the right 'green' building policies in place, we could change the building materials being used. This is an opportunity for forest products as a tradable commodity in green building."

Satellite-based laser measurements found that the average height of temperate forests along the West Coast is more than 130 feet, taller than boreal forests in Eurasia and Canada, tropical rainforests and broadleaf forests in Europe and the U.S. The only comparable forests are in Southeast Asia.

Scientists studying the absorption of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere suspect that forests with the biggest trees store the most carbon, which would mean the coastal forests from California through British Columbia are among the largest carbon "sinks" in the world.

Oneil, also a research associate at the University of Washington's School of Forest Resources, said the consortium does not recommend cutting all old-growth forests, which are critical for wildlife habitat and recreation. But she did suggest forests could be managed to absorb more carbon.

"If you don't pick the carrots, you can't plant the next crop," she said.

Rick Dunning, executive director of Washington Farm Forestry Association, said, "This study is going to help recognize the great value of all forestry. You don't want to point a finger at old growth vs. new growth."

Dunning represents small forest land owners, who have few old trees, he said. "The study is not really a hope for tree farmers, but it extends the dialogue of current policy, which is eroding rather than promoting forestry."

Comments made about this article

Posted By: John Browne On: 10/12/2010

Title: self-justifying "science" strikes again

A research arm, which is a consortium of "research groups" (just which ones being very difficult to discern) of the USDA FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY basically justifies the "industrial plantation" model of "forestry" practiced by timber giants, eg Weyerhaeuser, Plum Creek, etc. Should I be surprised? No... because it's very likely that the timber companies are paying for this research, in order to justify their practices. The idea that "carbon storage is faster" in young trees is based upon... what? It's like saying that "the moon is farther away". The idea that we should cut all that old, inefficient timber and mill it into... something, and plant new trees to "soak up more carbon" is an industrial wet dream, that has no bearing on forestry, ecology, sustainability or anything connected with Nature. It's about "making money with as little input as possible, as fast as possible, and to hell with all that 'ecological science' bunk!" Thanks, CORRIM, for toeing the mark of the industries that contribute to your well-being. ^..^

Report Inappropriate Content

Comment on this article

You must LOGIN to post comments

Advertisement

Copyright © 2009-2012 Capital Press, MediaSpan and The Associated Press where indicated. All rights reserved.

Contact Capital Press at 1-800-882-6789 or click here to find our staff listing.

Site optimized for use with Firefox browser, Ver. 8.0

Privacy Policies: Capital Press | MediaSpan Online Services

Other Capital Press websites:

Capital Press | OnlyAg.com | Ag Ads Now | Farm Seller | Ag Directory West | Blogriculture agriculture blog and podcasts | Capital Press Digital Marketing Services

Our sister East Oregonian Publishing Co. websites:

The Daily Astorian | Coast Weekend | AstoriaRocks.com | Chinook Observer
| Seaside-Sun.com| Hermiston Herald | East Oregonian |
Eastern Oregon Real Estate | EO Marketplace | Blue Mountain Eagle | Wallowa County Chieftain